Debate PoliticsAvis 

I was a new account. Within three days I was banned for”multiple accounts”. I don’t have multiple accounts.

No warning, no explanation. A note saying I could appeal; but because I’m banned, I can’t even open the appeals page, let alone file an appeal. It’s amateur hour, and maybe why they get such mediocre reviews.

Ive been a member of this website for a long time but its just turned into bullying and threats against other people its really gotten down hill some people might disagree but the way i see it is the people who are seen as liberal get attacked the most the moderators are verbally abusive to people with strict rules that they just come up with to punish people that they dont like.

One moderator threatened to rape me in a very violent way as a response to my opposition to organized gangs of child rapists. The entire ownership is just fine with it

Keir Starmer stood in the Commons and blatantly Iied to the House.
He was responding to the fact that he knowingly placed a convicted fraudster in charge of a major government department.
He tried to deflect attention from himself and falsely accused Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson of having criminal convictions.
This is not true.
Neither Boris Johnson or Rishi Sunak have any criminal convictions.
Starmer knows this.
Keir Starmer is a former Director of Public Prosecutions.
He knows the law.
He is a DAMN DISGRACE! Does he expect the public to “Sir Him with Love or more deservedly A Kick Up his Backside? “

This wasn't a mistake on his part.
He knew what he was saying isn't true and he said it anyway.
He stood up and outright Iied to Parliament in order to deflect criticism from his own behaviour.
Deliberately misleading the House is usually a resigning matter for Ministers.

This is a really good site. I've been on there since 2019 and only ever gotten a courtesy warning. I leans a little left, which is fine by me, but no one gets kicked off because they're conservative. They get banned because the don't follow the rules or because they create second accounts.

I was extremely polite and respectful on this site, but I presented conservative (right leaning) views. I was given warnings for non issues. When they cited the rules I had broken, the rules were completely unrelated to what had actually occured. I had an account 10 years ago that I couldn't remember the login information for and I hadn't posted on the account for ten years. One of their rules is that you're not allowed to have two accounts, so when they learned I had an account ten years ago, they automatically banned me. I submitted an appeal explaining I couldn't remember my previous login and they never replied. This is a highly biased cite that appears to want to create an echo chamber. They appear only value donating members. Members complain to the moderators when they lose an argument and the moderators give you warnings and infractions on response. Moderators also get mad when they lose arguments they engage in on the site and give you infractions in response.

Heavily partisan site that punishes people for being conservative. They only want this to be an echo chamber of liberalism.

In the present era, we find ourselves amidst a sea of unfortunate political decisions that significantly impact our daily lives. However, there is hope in the form of vigilant monitoring of the current situation and ongoing developments. By remaining observant and well-informed, both the public and decision-makers can gain awareness of seemingly insignificant issues that possess the potential to create substantial challenges in the future.

Big Brother here won't let me use a V.P.N, disposable email, and privacy-respecting internet browser at the same time for registering an account. He won't respect my online anonymity. So, I won't register an account here. I don't trust governments to know what is best for me. So, I would rather debate and discuss politics without Big Brother preventing my online anonymity.