Financial Commission Avis 24

I am writing this to alert the community about a critical failure in the dispute resolution process. My experience with this organization has shown a concerning lack of accountability.
​The Issue:
A final decision was issued based on the financial data of a completely unrelated account instead of my own. The mediator admitted in writing that a "typo" occurred during the investigation, leading to a decision based on incorrect withdrawal and profit data that does not match my actual transaction history.
​The Breach of Trust:
Despite the written admission of this material error, the body has refused to reopen the case or rectify the decision. Even more concerning is that they have now officially ceased all communication on this matter, effectively shielding the broker from a legitimate claim based on their own administrative negligence.
​Conclusion:
A mediation body that refuses to correct a proven factual error and then stops communicating with the victim loses its status as a neutral party. I have escalated this matter to the relevant regulators and the public domain.
​Transparency Note: I have provided full evidence of the admitted error and the subsequent refusal to communicate to Trustpilot for verification purposes.

after 70 days decision is out side their jurisdiction

𝘐 𝘴𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘥 £10,700 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘐𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘮𝘺 𝘩𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘐 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘬𝘢𝘺 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘭 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘐 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘯’𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘥𝘳𝘢𝘸 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘴 𝘐 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘐 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘓𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘐 𝘨𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘵 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘍𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘈𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦

A broker denied me a withdrawal of almost 4k. Thanks to the Financial Commission, I was able to get my money back after a few months. They analyzed the situation and made this decision. Thank you very much.

They asked for extra money to process my withdrawal, which seemed suspicious. CLǑTTÊR | WAVEŚ helped me reclaim my funds.

Scam ❌, don’t trust them!! I was completely ripped off!!!
I ended up asking for help, and 🄶🆁𝓔🆈𝓞𝓧🄷🆄🄱🆂 helped me recover £13,350 without any issues.
Highly recommended.

I am not sure yer whether i will contact them again, but they solved my problem

financial commission is not a regulator, it's commercial non-government organisation, that sells fake certificates to fraudulent companies for these companies to look "legit" in the eyes of naive users, at the same time fincom act as extortion business towards legitimate companies by posting false articles and trying to force these companies to pay money to clean their reputation

I was dealing with a really stressful situation and turned to 🅙🅤🅢🅣🅘🅒🅔🅕🅘🅔🅛🅓 for help. I was impressed by how professional and transparent they were throughout the whole process. They kept me in the loop with clear explanations and actually stuck to the timelines they promised. Their attention to detail and accountability made a huge difference. I’d highly recommend them if you need reliable support.

Action was taken, my money was returned, Angus, thank you.

Bull stuff, fake. Falsely claims to award compensation. Indians.

This is just a shell company to instill a confident in a scam company. So after the scam executed, this company will just act that the scam company broken a rules and they have no connection to the scam company. So any claim whatsoever are no longer within their responsibility. This is India company, that alone is enough to tell the whole story here

THIRD CLASS FINANCIAL COMMISSION

JUST WRITING ON GOOGLE THAT WE WILL RESOLVE THE ISSUE IN 14 DAYS AND TODAY IS 24 DAY STILL THE ISSUE OF DISPUTE RAISED IS NOT RESOLVED AND THESE GUYS Antoly IS REPLYING ME TO SEARCH GOOGLE KID

ARE YOU A GENUINE FINANCIAL COMMISSION OF A BIG FRAUD....???

I really glad full to financial Commission they have credit the my profit from ya market group which have debit my profit after three I have got my profit really appreciate it&they investigation, decision, implementation there motive ,two times they have helped me

I had suspicions before raising a case with the 'financial commission' against IC Markets and their fraudulent brokerage activites. Unfortunately these suspicions rang true based on the heavy bias in their wording from their 'findings'. They simply say what the broker wants them to say, bear in mind they're funded by brokers so there's a financial conflict of interest from the get go. If you're trying to reclaim compensation for broker malpractice you're better off appointing a solicitor, joining a class action or going through a real mediatory body - which these clowns, are not.

I had a deeply disappointing experience with the Financial Commission. Despite my legitimate and well-documented complaint against Blueberry Markets, their handling of the case revealed significant bias. It’s important for other traders to be aware that this organization is not truly impartial, as it is funded by the very brokers they claim to regulate.

Here’s why I believe the Financial Commission is not trustworthy:

Unjustified Complaint Rejection: The Financial Commission never accepted my complaint, citing that it was filed outside their 45-day deadline. Despite this, they decided to conduct an informal review when their “boss,” Blueberry Markets, requested them to do so. This shows a clear conflict of interest, as it appears they will only reconsider a complaint when it benefits the broker that funds them.

Biased and One-Sided Review: In their informal review, they refused to accept supporting documents from my side and only considered the information provided by Blueberry Markets. This left me unable to present my case fairly and calls into question their role as an independent arbiter.

Double Standards: After Blueberry Markets requested reconsideration, the Financial Commission sent two separate emails rejecting my complaint, with inconsistent justifications. One email stated that they couldn’t issue a formal decision, while the other reiterated the 45-day deadline without further explanation.

Conflict of Interest: Since brokers, including Blueberry Markets, are paying members of the Financial Commission, it’s clear that there’s a conflict of interest. Their actions suggest they prioritize brokers' interests over protecting traders.

My experience shows that the Financial Commission lacks the impartiality required for fair dispute resolution. I urge other traders to be cautious before relying on them.

My experience with [axi] was unsatisfactory. The Finance Committee failed to respond to my inquiries and did not provide the support I needed when I appeared. Their lack of expected support led me to question their credibility in resolving disputes and they sided with the mediator or responded that it was outside their jurisdiction.

Not Provided Any Type Of Financial Solution.They Only Setup Look Like a Professional Website But They Unable To Solve Any Financial Problems They Reply Same As Broker Reply Not Any Other Things .When You Show There Website You Think They Can Solve Any Financial issue With There Partner Broker.Thats Worst Service Provideder I Ever Seen in My Life.

Tengan mucho cuidado con los bróker que están
en La Financial SCAM, parece ser una organización RUSA.
No tienen ningún bróker de primer nivel, solo los
SCAM australianos.
Les parece bien que Fusión Markets, aumente el spread en 40.000% en determinados momentos en
el EURGBP, si operan con cobertura y/o stop sus
cuentas estarán a cero.
Los SCAM AUSTRALIANOS hacen negocio con los Rusos. mas bien parecen organizaciones criminales,
ALEX SIDOROF, eres musico?

2 Libras de capital social, he dicho bien dos libras
de capital social, no presenta cuentas desde 2023
Bielorrusia y rusia, increíble como se permite esto.

La mayoría de bróker australianos presumiendo
de estar relacionados.

Tämä huijaus näyttää pitkälti samalta kuin WiseWealth.
Uutena juttuna tekijät varoittavat muista huijaussivuista omalla listallaan mutta entistä huijaussivua ei listasta löydy.
Näppärä keino pudottaa kilpailijoita pois markkinoilta.
Terveisiä Jamielle