Oneprovider Avis 

I've tested this service extensively and found significant discrepancies between the advertised models and what's actually served. While they claim to offer premium models like GPT-5, Claude fable/opus, and GLm etc, the responses suggest they're actually using fine-tuned open-source alternatives, likely Llama or Qwen variants based on their capabilities with tools and frameworks like OpenClaw.

Key Observations:

Model Substitution: The advertised models don't match actual performance. Responses have different characteristics, knowledge cutoffs, and reasoning patterns compared to authentic premium models.
Tool Use: The models do work with external tools and frameworks like OpenClaw, indicating they're not small 7B-parameter models but likely mid-range (30B+) variants.
Image/Video Quality: Some image models are surprisingly good, possibly using Meta production models at these low price points.
Pricing: The cost structure ($1000 credits for ~$75) is unsustainable if they were serving authentic premium models, suggesting significant model substitution.
Pros:

Very affordable pricing, especially for image/video generation
Some models perform surprisingly well despite not being authentic
Wide model selection available through single API
Cons:

Not trustworthy for sensitive data - unclear what models are actually processing your information
Lack of transparency about actual model routing
Only English and Russian language support despite claiming EU origin
Telegram-only transactions - unprofessional and raises security concerns
Recommendation:

Advanced users who understand model fingerprinting might find value here for non-critical tasks
Beginners or business users should avoid this service and choose more transparent providers
Do not use for sensitive data, commercial applications, or where model authenticity matters
Final Thoughts:
While the pricing is attractive, the lack of transparency about actual model routing is a significant concern. The service delivers some value for specific use cases, but users should approach with extreme caution and understand they're not getting what's advertised. The image/video models appear to be the strongest offering, while text models show clear signs of substitution

This is a very good platform. I also really liked it.

All good! Highly recommend

they advertise top models but the performance is even worse then some models from over a year ago.
the AI is trained to act like its fabel 5, the output is low quality.

Total scam, they say that they use some technics to provide real Anthropic models at lower cost but in fact they use cheap models with system prompt to hide the fact they use cheaper models.
But I have run some real tests between real Opus 5 and their fake Opus 5 and it's totally not Opus 5 behind.

It's a scam. Models they provide are fake and dumber than DeepSeek Lite.

Just scam, there is an AI behind the proxy but its defintely not Claude. This was not clear from description when buying. API Response times are slow. Its basically not useable.

Die Behauptung: Günstige API‑Tokens für Claude über Oneprovider. Eine Anfrage wird mehrfach vom Server abgefragt andabgerechnet, was normalerweise bei offiziellen Claude‑Anbietern nicht passiert. Das ist eine Masche — ich kaufe dort nie wieder.