Failed residential conveyancing through inaction
We chose Chubb Bulleid for the purchase of a flat specifically because they advertised a service “going beyond the basic transactional conveyancing service.” Our experience demonstrated the opposite.
Over an eight month period, Chubb Bulleid failed to progress the purchase with the necessary diligence, accuracy, or urgency. Despite repeated warnings from us that our mortgage offer was at risk of expiring — and that any renewed offer would be unaffordable due to market changes — no meaningful action was taken. As a result, the purchase collapsed when the mortgage offer expired.
After reviewing the full email trail, complaint correspondence, and subsequent actions, several serious concerns are clear:
1. Lack of proactive case management
• The Legal Executive relied almost exclusively on sending emails, despite acknowledging early on that the management company were slow to respond.
• There is no evidence she ever telephoned the management company directly , and her claim that they would not speak to her was false; when we eventually contacted them ourselves, they engaged without issue.
2. Unacceptable delays and missed opportunities
• Chubb Bulleid stated that an 18 working day period with no action was “acceptable,” and that repeated 1–2 week gaps were “normal,” even after we raised the urgency relating to the mortgage offer.
• Four weeks were wasted pursuing an indemnity insurance policy that the mortgage provider ultimately rejected, despite the fact that a deed of variation was required. There is no evidence our offer to pay for the deed of variation was ever put to the vendors.
3. Inaccurate statements and deflection of responsibility
• Throughout the correspondence, blame was repeatedly placed on other parties (the vendor’s solicitors and the management company), with no acknowledgement of Chubb Bulleid’s own omissions or failures.
• Several statements made by the Legal Executive and later by the Director were misleading.
4. Poor complaint handling and lack of accountability
• When we raised a complaint after five months, the response included encouraging language but avoided answering key questions.
• It was clear the firm “marked their own homework,” judged themselves by their own standards, and failed to recognise any deficiencies in their service.
These failures have cost us substantial time, money, and stress. The firm’s unwillingness to take responsibility, combined with misleading statements and a lack of professional diligence, raises serious concerns about their reliability and integrity.
We are escalating this matter to the Legal Ombudsman and wish to formally record that Chubb Bulleid did not provide the competent, proactive, or trustworthy service they advertise. We urge caution to anyone considering using this firm, particularly for leasehold purchases where effective management of third party agencies is essential.








