dooyooAvis 

نسبة جودة المنتج من متوسط الى جيد لكني لا اراه يستحق 5 نجوم

The reason why is because I don't live on Dooyoo. It soon becomes clear that there are certain groups who are never off of there - it's almost like a full time job; their reason to live and breathe as it were. And that's where it all falls down - Crowns should be given by the Dooyoo team - not nominated by Dooyoo users. Time and again, too many people comment on the unfairness of this system. It's easy to team up with mates and periodically nominate them and vice versa - but it doesn't mean those reviews are especially good or that the system is fair.

Dooyoo is best for software review even it's help you in making or earning money through their site . People are using this software for last 2 year and people will recommend this product to everyone

Agree with the other reviewer, product descriptions are tedious and the site is more like an English academy than a consumer review site. Concise accurate reviews are penalised for 'war and peace' type novels about the size of the lettering. I am surprised it has survived this long.

This is a terrible experience simply because of the way it's monitored (or not monitored). I couldn't agree more with the person who said that you get cliques of people who vote-up each other's reviews or nominate their 'clique' members for Crowns (if you're nominated for a Crown and earn one, you get more points - which leads to a quicker reward). It is also true, for some reason, that reviewers find it necessary to be overly verbose and descriptive - so you'll have huge paragraphs on the way a product's packaging looks (even though you can see from the photo). And if other long-term members don't think you've put in enough 'effort' (because it's all about the quantity of the review and not the quality of Dooyoo) then they'll quickly tell you where to improve.

I write for a living - so I know that most of my reviews are logical, well-written etc (although I find myself deliberately writing more to conform with the 'more is more' Dooyoo philosophy), yet I hardly ever get nominated for a Crown. The reason why is because I don't live on Dooyoo. It soon becomes clear that there are certain groups who are never off of there - it's almost like a full time job; their reason to live and breathe as it were. And that's where it all falls down - Crowns should be given by the Dooyoo team - not nominated by Dooyoo users. Time and again, too many people comment on the unfairness of this system. It's easy to team up with mates and periodically nominate them and vice versa - but it doesn't mean those reviews are especially good or that the system is fair.

It's also impossible to find out how to put forward new products to review. If you try writing to Dooyoo with a query you get ignored.

So, by all means review on Dooyoo but don't expect to be allowed to be concise; don't expect to get nominated for Crowns even if your review is very good (or better than others); don't expect to hear back if you write to Dooyoo - and do expect to get spoken down to by long-standing members of Dooyoo.

Potentially a good idea, but its a good idea like chat rooms are - good ideas and views abound but are swamped by swaggering, verbose Captain Mainwaring (from Dads Army) types. Small clique of dominant people voting for each other and putting down anybody else's view! (They can comment even if they have never tried the product!...how does this help a fair evaluation?)

For a more democratic (and accurate) view of products, try Reevoo, or Amazon. At least these people have bought/tried the product.
Remember that Dooyoo people are doing it for the rewards....Reevoo/Amazon guys are merely sharing their experience.