Vinted facilitates unjust enrichment – no payment and no items returned
I sold a bundle of multiple items. One item was damaged during shipping, but the buyer explicitly admitted in writing that the other items arrived in perfect condition. Despite this, Vinted refunded the total amount to the buyer, who kept my undamaged items for free. I have neither my money nor my goods. This is a clear case of unjust enrichment and financial loss. Vinted’s internal policies cannot override civil law! I demand payment for the undamaged items that the buyer kept.








